Please wait a minute...
E-mail Alert Rss
 
物探与化探  2009, Vol. 33 Issue (6): 737-740    
  工程勘察 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
电法在基桩桩长检测中的应用
李洪涛1,2,王营超2,雷鸣2,刘文增2
1.中国地质大学 地球物理与空间信息学院, 湖北 武汉 430000;  2. 中国地质调查局 水文地质环境地质调查中心,河北 保定 071051
THE APPLICATION OF GEOPHYSICAL ELECTRIC METHODTO THE INSPECTION OF FOUNDATION PILE LENGTH
LI Hongtao 1,2,WANG Yingchao 2,LEI Ming 2,LIU Wenzeng 2
1.Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics,China University of Geoscience, Wuhan 430000, China; 2. Hydrogeological and Environmental Geological Surveying Center, China Geological Survey, Baoding 071051, China
全文: PDF(682 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

应用地下单点电极(或多点电极)与无穷远电极向地下供电产生电场分布的特点,通过检测地表电位差的分布,可以确定地下单点电极(或多点电极)的埋深,从而达到检测混凝土管桩桩长的目的。结合工程项目,对预应力管桩的实际桩长进行了检测,电测井测试对比检验说明检测是成功的。用电法检验工程桩桩长,弥补了低应变反射波法难于有效、精确检测多节预应力管桩实际桩长的困难局面,可有效发现工程质量隐患。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
Abstract

On the basis of the electric field distribution characteristics produced by underground-orientated current supply from singlepoint electrode (or multi-point electrode) and infinite electrode and through detection of potential difference distribution at surface, we can determine the buried depth of underground single-point electrode (or multi-point electrode) and, on such a basis, determine the length of the concrete pipe pile. In combination with the inspection of the real pile length of the prestress pipe pile, the authors made electric logging comparative test and found that the inspection was successful. The achievements made by the authors can remedy the ineffectiveness of the low strain reflection wave method and overcome the difficulty in precise determination of the practical length of the multi-joint prestress pipe pile. It is thus held that geophysical electric method can be used to determine the length of the engineering pile and prevent the hidden trouble in engineering quality caused by saving illegally on material and labor.

收稿日期: 2009-05-08      出版日期: 2009-12-10
: 

P631.3

 
引用本文:   
李洪涛, 王营超, 雷鸣, 刘文增. 电法在基桩桩长检测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2009, 33(6): 737-740.
LI Hong-Tao, WANG Ying-Chao, LEI Ming, LIU Wen-Zeng. THE APPLICATION OF GEOPHYSICAL ELECTRIC METHODTO THE INSPECTION OF FOUNDATION PILE LENGTH. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2009, 33(6): 737-740.
链接本文:  
https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/      或      https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2009/V33/I6/737
[1] 李莲英. 瞬变电磁勘探方法解释煤矿采空影响范围[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(S1): 171-174.
[2] 贾永梅, 姚成林, 邓中俊, 房纯纲, 王会宾, 李良景, 李远强. 可控源音频大地电磁法探测煤矿采空区[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(S1): 7-11.
[3] 杨镜明. 高密度电阻率法煤田采空区勘察效果[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(S1): 12-15.
[4] 汝亮, 钟伟杰, 朱裕振, 沈礼峰, 周明磊. 用瞬变电磁数据精细处理技术探测煤矿采空区[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(S1): 158-160.
[5] 王文忠, 马国林, 刘继东. 瞬变电磁视纵向电导成像法在寻找深部隐伏金属矿中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2011, 35(4): 473-476.
[6] 于景邨, 胡兵, 刘振庆, 廖俊杰, 蒋宗林. 矿井瞬变电磁探测技术的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2011, 35(4): 532-535.
[7] 罗维斌, 李庆春. 电阻率法监测地下地质变化的数值模拟[J]. 物探与化探, 2011, 35(4): 557-561.
[8] 龙建钢, 谢兴楠, 吴小平, 柳建新. 瞬变电磁测深中数据处理偏差及修正方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2011, 35(4): 553-556.
[9] 王国群. 探地雷达在淡水区浅水域的探测试验[J]. 物探与化探, 2011, 35(4): 565-568.
[10] 朱金华, 冒我冬, 白锦琳, 李华. CSAMT法在断层含水性评价中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2011, 35(4): 569-572.
[11] 范涛. TEM虚拟波场三维连续速度分析及其在隧道超前预报中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2011, 35(2): 243-247.
[12] 刘伟, 余友, 张明会. 南秘鲁QUELLAVECO铜矿激电测深异常[J]. 物探与化探, 2010, 34(4): 444-447.
[13] 刘保平, 刘菁华. 河南嵩县钼矿的电性特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2010, 34(4): 454-457.
[14] 李官保, 刘保华, 丁忠军. 基于DPHP技术测量沉积物热导率的数据处理[J]. 物探与化探, 2009, 33(6): 663-667.
[15] 汤永梅, 邹长春, 秦菲莉, 李凤琴. 利用核磁共振和双频电阻率测井评价高矿化度地层水淹层[J]. 物探与化探, 2009, 33(6): 668-673.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-3
版权所有 © 2021《物探与化探》编辑部
通讯地址:北京市学院路29号航遥中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060192;62060193 E-mail:whtbjb@sina.com