Please wait a minute...
E-mail Alert Rss
 
物探与化探  2008, Vol. 32 Issue (2): 171-174    
  方法技术研究 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
火山沉积岩及其矿床研究中伽马测井曲线解释的误区
冯宝华
中国地质科学院, 北京 100037
A MISTAKE IN THE INTERPRETATION OF GAMMA LOG CURVE FOR THE STUDY OF VOLCANIC SEDIMENTARY ROCKS AND RELATED ORE DEPOSITS
FENG Bao-hua
Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
全文: PDF(345 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

根据酸性凝灰岩和酸性火山事件粘土岩的自然伽马测井曲线,对当前流传的"沉积岩层的放射性强度(或放射性核素的含量)随泥质含量的增加而增高"的概念和用自然伽马值及经验公式求泥质含量提出质凝。酸性凝灰岩的自然伽马曲线有高异常响应,若解释为泥岩显然是误解,故将沉积岩伽马曲线高异常一律解释为泥岩是片面的。各类火山事件粘土岩的伽马值相差悬殊,但其泥质含量几乎相等,用它们的伽马值计算泥质含量误差甚大。最后对铝土矿层的伽马曲线稍加解释,指出核测井应用的远景。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
Abstract

Based on the natural gamma log curves of acid tuff and clay rocks of acid volcanic events, the author here queries the arguments that radioactive intensity of sedimentary strata will grow with the increasing argillaceous materials and that the natural gamma value and the empirical equation can be used to calculate contents of argillaceous materials. The natural gamma curve of acid tuff has high anomaly response, which can not be interpreted as the response of the mudstone. If we regard the gamma curve of high anomaly exclusively as anomaly of mudstone, the viewpoint is obviously one-sided. The gamma values of clay rocks of various volcanic events are different very considerably, and hence the utilization of the gamma values to calculate the contents of argillaceous materials is likely to result in remarkable errors. In the end of this paper, the author has explained in brief the gamma curve of the bauxite bed and discussed the prospects of the nuclear log.

收稿日期: 2007-06-30      出版日期: 2008-04-24
: 

P631

 
引用本文:   
冯宝华. 火山沉积岩及其矿床研究中伽马测井曲线解释的误区[J]. 物探与化探, 2008, 32(2): 171-174.
FENG Bao-hua. A MISTAKE IN THE INTERPRETATION OF GAMMA LOG CURVE FOR THE STUDY OF VOLCANIC SEDIMENTARY ROCKS AND RELATED ORE DEPOSITS. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2008, 32(2): 171-174.
链接本文:  
https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/      或      https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2008/V32/I2/171

[1] 叶庆生,李崇儒.自然伽马测井在煤田勘探中的应用与讨论[J].物探与化探,1980,3(3):39.
[2] 牛一雄,潘忠平,王文光,等.中国大陆科学钻探主孔(0~2000 m)地球物理测井[J].岩石学报,2004,26(1):165.
[3] 梁齐瑞,赵世龙.自然伽马测井曲线的分形特征分析[J].物探与化探,2006,30(3):240.
[4] 劳林娟.太原西山太原组蚀变流纹质沉凝灰岩的发现[J].煤田地质与勘探,1994,22(1):9.
[5] 佟再三.甘肃山丹煤田二叠系中火山碎屑岩的发现及其主要特征[J].沉积学报,1988,6(1):102.
[6] 黄志诚,黄钟谨,陈智娜.下扬子区五峰组火山碎屑岩与放射虫硅质岩[J].沉积学报,1991,9(2):1.

[1] 刘荻, 李贺. 物探检测方法在石拱桥病害整治工程中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(S1): 119-123.
[2] 苏艳平, 薛国强, 周楠楠, 徐赤斌. 板状体瞬变电磁正演计算系统[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(S1): 132-136.
[3] 原文涛. 瞬变电磁法在采空区及陷落柱探测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(S1): 164-167.
[4] 郝治国, 贾树林, 文群林. 综合物探方法在采空区及其富水性探测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(S1): 102-106.
[5] 黄群. 应用高密度电测深法和瞬变电磁法探测煤矿采空区[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(S1): 107-110.
[6] 薛永军, 武秀芳, 仲丛明, 李玉林. 煤矿小窑采空区及塌陷区的地球物理勘查[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(S1): 111-113.
[7] 郭伟立, 薛国强, 周楠楠, 肖宏跃. 利用瞬变电磁法监测煤矿含水采空区[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(S1): 114-118.
[8] 张淑婷. 地球物理勘查技术在探测煤矿采空区中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(S1): 83-87.
[9] 孙林. 高密度电阻率法与浅层地震在探测煤田采空区中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(S1): 88-91.
[10] 郄卫东. 瞬变电磁法在探测煤矿采空区及塌陷区中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(S1): 92-95.
[11] 何进, 张亚峰, 韦建江. 煤矿采空区综合地球物理方法探测[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(S1): 96-101.
[12] 赵明宣, 马惠珍, 辛永祺. 三种物探方法在煤矿采空区勘查中的应用效果对比[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(S1): 51-56.
[13] 苏兆锋, 陈昌彦, 肖敏, 贾辉, 白朝旭. 精细高密度电阻率法在白云岩矿采空区中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(S1): 45-47.
[14] 刘明, 王东华, 李波. CSAMT采集频率与相位参数在采空区勘查中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(S1): 48-50.
[15] 周楠楠, 薛国强. 瞬变电磁勘查中圆回线模拟方形回线的误差分析[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(S1): 57-60.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-3
版权所有 © 2021《物探与化探》编辑部
通讯地址:北京市学院路29号航遥中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060192;62060193 E-mail:whtbjb@sina.com