The resistivity method can be used for the detection of near ground surface, and can also be employed to monitor dynamic underground targets. For the inversion of monitoring data, the single inversion of different data sets has certain defects. For this reason, on the basis of the traditional resistivity inversion algorithm, the time-lapse resistivity inversion formula was derived and the time-lapse inversion program was realized; for the purpose of demonstrating the superiority of the time-lapse inversion algorithm for imaging of dynamic underground targets, a set of multiple forward models was established, and the simulation data were used for single inversion and time-lapse inversion. The results show that, although both algorithms can draw the dynamic underground targets, the time-lapse inversion algorithm can eliminate random errors contained in different observation data sets and reduce the occurrence of inversion artifacts.
苏鹏, 杨进. 时移电阻率反演模拟研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(1): 159-164.
SU Peng, YANG Jin. Simulation study of inversion of time-lapse resistivity. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2021, 45(1): 159-164.
French H, Binley A. Snowmelt infiltration: Monitoring temporal and spatial variability using time-lapse electrical resistivity[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2004, 297(1-4): 174-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.04.005
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.04.005
[2]
Oberdorster C, Vanderborght J, Kemna A, et al. Investigating preferential flow processes in a forest soil using time domain reflectometry and electrical resistivity tomography[J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 2010,9(2): 350-361. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2009.0073
doi: 10.2136/vzj2009.0073
[3]
Travelletti J, Sailhac P, Malet J P, et al. Hydrological response of weathered clay-shale slopes: Water infiltration monitoring with time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2012,26(14): 2106-2119. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7983
doi: 10.1002/hyp.7983
[4]
Looms M C, Jensen K H, Binley A, et al. Monitoring unsaturated flow and transport using cross-borehole geophysical methods[J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 2008, 7(1): 227-237. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2006.0129
doi: 10.2136/vzj2006.0129
[5]
Binley A, Hubbard S S, Huisman J A, et al. The emergence of hydrogeophysics for improved understanding of subsurface processes over multiple scales[J]. Water Resources Research, 2015, 51(6): 3837-3866. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017016
doi: 10.1002/2015WR017016
pmid: 26900183
[6]
Ogilvy R D, Meldrum P I, Kuras O, et al. Automated monitoring of coastal aquifers with electrical resistivity tomography[J]. Near Surface Geophysics, 2009, 7(5-6): 367-376. https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2009027
doi: 10.3997/1873-0604.2009027
[7]
Robert T, Caterina D, Deceuster J, et al. A salt tracer test monitored with surface ERT to detect preferential flow and transport paths in fractured/karstified limestones[J]. Geophysics, 2012, 77(2): B55-B67. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0313.1
doi: 10.1190/GEO2011-0313.1
[8]
Krautblatter M, Verleysdonk S, Flores-Orozco A, et al. Temperature-calibrated imaging of seasonal changes in permafrost rock walls by quantitative electrical resistivity tomography (Zugspitze, German/Austrian Alps)[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 2010,115(2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF001209
[9]
Hermans T, Wildemeersch S, Jamin P, et al. Quantitative temperature monitoring of a heat tracing experiment using cross-borehole ERT[J]. Geothermics, 2015, 53: 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.03.013
doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.03.013
[10]
Arato A, Boaga J, Comina C, et al. Geophysical monitoring for shallow geothermal applications-Two Italian case histories[J]. First Break, 2015,33:75-79.
Li F, Cheng J L, Chen S J, et al. Fine detection of overburden strata based on time lapse high density resistivity method[J]. Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2019, 4(1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10. 19606 /j. cnki. jmst.2019.01.001
Sun D L, Li X, Qi Y F, et al. Time-lapse characteristics analysis of hidden dangers of three-dimensional finite element levees based on unstructured grids[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2019, 43(4): 804-814. https://doi.org/10.11720/wtyht.2019.0045
[13]
Daily W, Ramirez A, LaBrecque D, et al. Electrical resistivity tomography of vadose water movement[J]. Water Resources Research, 1992, 28(5): 1429-1442. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR03087
doi: 10.1029/91WR03087
[14]
LaBrecque D J, Yang X. Difference inversion of ERT data: A fast inversion method for 3-D in situ monitoring[J]. Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics, 2001, 6(2): 83-89. https://doi.org/10.4133/JEEG6.2.83
[15]
Kim J H, Yi M J, Park S G, et al. 4-D inversion of DC resistivity monitoring data acquired over a dynamically changing earth model[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2009, 68(4): 522-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2009.03.002
doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2009.03.002
[16]
Hayley K, Pidlisecky A, Bentley L R. Simultaneous time-lapse electrical resistivity inversion[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2011, 75(2): 401-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.06.035
doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.06.035
[17]
Karaoulis M C, Kim J H, Tsourlos P I. 4D active time constrained resistivity inversion[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2011, 73(1): 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2010.11.002
doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2010.11.002
[18]
Loke M H, Dahlin T, Rucker D F. Smoothness-constrained time-lapse inversion of data from 3D resistivity surveys[J]. Near Surface Geophysics, 2014, 12(1): 5-24. https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2013025
doi: 10.3997/1873-0604.2013025
[19]
Pidlisecky A, Haber E, Knight R. RESINVM3D: A 3-D resistivity inversion package[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(2): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2402499
[20]
Yi M J, Kim J H, Chung S H. Enhancing the resolving power of least-squares inversion with active constraint balancing[J]. Geophysics, 2003, 68(3): 931-941. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1581045
doi: 10.1190/1.1581045
