Please wait a minute...
E-mail Alert Rss
 
物探与化探  2020, Vol. 44 Issue (3): 665-671    DOI: 10.11720/wtyht.2020.0071
     中国地质学会勘探地球物理专委会2019年会优秀论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
波形指示反演在灰质发育区薄互层浊积岩预测中的应用——以牛庄洼陷沙三中亚段为例
孔省吾, 张云银, 沈正春, 张建芝, 魏红梅, 宋艳阁, 王甜
中国石化胜利油田分公司物探研究院,山东 东营 257022
The application of waveform inversion prediction of thin turbidite reservoir to calcareous depositional area:A case study of $\text{E}_{3}s_{3}^{2}$ in Niuzhuang sag
Xing-Wu KONG, Yun-Yin ZHANG, Zheng-Chun SHEN, Jian-Zhi ZHANG, Hong-Mei WEI, Yan-Ge SONG, Tian WANG
Geophysical Research Institute of Shengli Oilfield Company,SINOPEC,Dongying 257022,China
全文: PDF(6546 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

在高勘探程度阶段,牛庄洼陷沙三中亚段浊积岩油藏主要勘探对象是“个体小、薄互层、橫变快、含灰质”的复杂隐蔽储层。针对薄互层砂体地震难分辨、灰质泥岩背景下砂岩难识别两大难题,开展了岩性敏感曲线重构和波形指示反演相结合的砂体预测研究。结果表明:波形指示反演明显压制了灰质泥岩对砂体预测的干扰,利用波形横向变化代替传统变差函数进行高频成分模拟,提高了反演精度,5 m以上储层预测结果与实钻井吻合度为88.5%,2~5 m储层预测吻合度达到80.5%。反演砂体分布符合研究区沉积演化规律及油藏流体分布认识。利用反演结果指导牛庄洼陷滚动探井和开发井部署,在5个开发区共部署滚动探井和开发井20口,其中8口井完钻投产后获得工业油流,预计新建产能4×104 t。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
孔省吾
张云银
沈正春
张建芝
魏红梅
宋艳阁
王甜
关键词 敏感曲线重构波形指示反演薄互层浊积岩储层预测沙三中亚段牛庄洼陷    
Abstract

In the high exploration stage,the exploration target of the turbidite reservoirs of $\text{E}_{3}\text{S}_{3}^{2}$ in Niuzhuang sag has been gradually turned to complex subtle reservoir whose characteristics are small scale,thin thickness,rapid lateral variation and containing carbonate.It is difficult to describe the thin interbed reservoir using conventional seismic data,and is also difficult to identify sandstone in gray background.To tackle these problems,the authors studied the prediction of sand reservoir by combining the reconstruction of lithologic sensitive curve with the inversion of waveform indication.It turns out that seismic indication inversion obviously suppresses the interference of gray matter components,and the inversion using lateral variation of waveform instead of traditional variation function can improve the inversion accuracy,with the accuracy of thickness above 5 m being 88.5%,and that of thickness of 2~5 m being 80.2%.The inversion of sand conforms to the sedimentary law and the reservoir fluid distribution in the study area.By applying the reservoir prediction results,a total of 20 exploration wells were deployed in 5 development blocks,of which 8 wells were drilled and industrial oil was obtained after they were put into production,with the new expected capacity being about 4×104 t.

Key wordssensitive curve reconstruction    seismic waveform inversion    thin turbidite reservoir    reservoir prediction    $\text{E}_{3}s_{3}^{2}$    Niuzhuang sag
收稿日期: 2020-01-19      出版日期: 2020-06-24
:  P613.4  
基金资助:国家科技重大专项“渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷致密油开发示范工程”(2017ZX05072)
作者简介: 孔省吾(1983-),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事地震地质综合研究工作。Email: kongshengwu.slyt@sinopec.com
引用本文:   
孔省吾, 张云银, 沈正春, 张建芝, 魏红梅, 宋艳阁, 王甜. 波形指示反演在灰质发育区薄互层浊积岩预测中的应用——以牛庄洼陷沙三中亚段为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(3): 665-671.
Xing-Wu KONG, Yun-Yin ZHANG, Zheng-Chun SHEN, Jian-Zhi ZHANG, Hong-Mei WEI, Yan-Ge SONG, Tian WANG. The application of waveform inversion prediction of thin turbidite reservoir to calcareous depositional area:A case study of $\text{E}_{3}s_{3}^{2}$ in Niuzhuang sag. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2020, 44(3): 665-671.
链接本文:  
https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/10.11720/wtyht.2020.0071      或      https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2020/V44/I3/665
Fig.1  波形指示反演基本流程
Fig.2  牛庄洼陷沙三中亚段砂岩、泥岩和灰质泥岩声波阻抗概率分布
Fig.3  常规波阻抗反演剖面
Fig.4  地震波形指示反演剖面
Fig.5  牛庄洼陷西部沙三中亚段反演体切片
a—第一期次反演体切片;b—第二期次反演体切片;c—第三期次反演体切片;d—第四期次反演体切片
Fig.6  NZ洼陷N106井区地震剖面(a)及波形反演剖面(b)
[1] 王慧勇, 陈世悦, 张云银, 等. 东营凹陷浊积岩优质储层预测技术[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2014,49(4):776-783.
[1] Wang H Y, Chen S Y, Zhang Y Y, et al. Turbidite high-quality reservoir prediction in Dongying Depression[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2014,49(4):776-783.
[2] 孙淑艳, 朱应科, 沈正春. 东营凹陷东部浊积岩储层地震识别技术及描述思路[J]. 油气地球物理, 2015,3(2):1-6.
[2] Sun S Y, Zhu Y K, Shen Z C. Seismic identification techniques for tubidite reservoirs in the east of Dongying Sag and descripttion clues[J]. Petroleum Geophysics, 2015,3(2):1-6.
[3] 齐宇, 刘震, 魏建新, 等. 基于小波变换的谱分解技术在地震模型解释中的应用[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2010,31(4):417-419.
[3] Qi Y, Liu Z, Wei J X, et al. Application of wavelet transform based spectral decomposition technique to seismic model interpretation[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2010,31(4):417-419.
[4] 孙夕平, 李劲松, 郑晓东, 等. 调谐能量增强法在石南21井区薄储集层识别中的应用[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2007(6):711-717.
[4] Sun X P, Li J S, Zheng X D, et al. Application of tuning-energy-enhanced method to thin bed identification in Block Shinan 21[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2007(6):711-717.
[5] 夏亚良, 魏小东, 叶玉峰, 等. 广义S变换多频解释技术及其在薄层评价中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2019,43(1):168-175.
[5] Xia Y L, Wei X D, Ye Y F, et al. Generalized S transform multi-frequency interpretation technique and its application in thin reservoir evaluation[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2019,43(1):168-175.
[6] 张军华, 刘培金, 朱博华, 等. 滩坝砂储层地震解释存在的问题及对策[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2014,49(1):167-175.
[6] Zhang J H, Liu P J, Zhu B H, et al. Problems and countermeasures in seismic interpretation of beach bar sandstone reservoirs[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2014,49(1):167-175.
[7] 何火华, 李少华, 杜家元, 等. 利用地质统计学反演进行薄砂体储层预测[J]. 物探与化探, 2011,35(6):804-808.
[7] He H H, Li S H, Du J Y, et al. The application of geostatistic invrsion method to predicting the thin sandstone reservoir[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2011,35(6):804-808.
[8] 段南. 叠前地震波形指示反演在薄互储层预测中的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019,34(2):523-528.
[8] Duan N. Application of prestack seismic waveform indicates inversion in thin reservoir prediction[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2019,34(2):523-528.
[9] 周游, 高刚, 桂志先, 等. 灰质发育背景下识别浊积岩优质储层的技术研究——以东营凹陷董集洼陷为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2017,41(5):899-906.
[9] Zhou Y, Gao G, Gui Z X, et al. Study on the identification of turbidite high-quality reservoirs under gray background:A case study in dongji sag of Dong ying depression[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2017,41(5):899-906.
[10] 顾雯, 徐敏, 王铎翰, 等. 地震波形指示反演技术在薄储层预测中的应用——以准噶尔盆地B地区薄层砂岩气藏为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016,27(11):2064-2066.
[10] Gu W, Xu M, Wang D H, et al. Application of seismic motion inversion technology in thin reservoir prediction:A case study of the thin sandstone gas reservoir in the B area of Junggar Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016,27(11):2064-2066.
[11] 高君, 毕建军, 赵海山, 等. 地震波形指示反演薄储层预测技术及其应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2017,32(1):142-145.
[11] Gao J, Bi J J, Zhao H S, et al. Seismic waveform inversion technology and application of thinner reservoir prediction[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2017,32(1):142-145.
[12] 杨微. 基于波形指示反演的井震结合储层预测方法及应用[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2018,37(3):137-144.
[12] Yang W. Well-Seismic combined reservoir predicting method based on the waveform indication inversion and its application[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2018,37(3):137-144.
[13] 韩长城, 林承焰, 任丽华, 等. 地震波形指示反演在东营凹陷王家岗地区沙四上亚段滩坝砂的应用[J]. 中国石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2017,41(2):60-68.
[13] Han C C, Lin C Y, Ren L H, et al. Application of seismic waveform inversion in Es4s beach-bar sandstone in Wangjia-gang area,Dongying Depression[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science, 2017,41(2):60-68.
[14] 杨涛, 乐友喜, 吴勇. 波形指示反演在储层预测中的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2018,33(2):769-776.
[14] Yang T, Yue Y X, Wu Y. Application of thewaveform inversion in reservoir prediction[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2018,33(2):769-776.
[15] 李亚哲, 王力宝, 郭华军, 等. 基于地震波形指示反演的砂砾岩储层预测——以中拐—玛南地区上乌尔禾组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019,31(2):134-142.
[15] Li Y Z, Wang L B, Guo H J, et al. Prediction of glutenite reservoir based on seismic waveform indicative inversion:A case study of Upper Urho Formation in Zhongguai—Manan area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019,31(2):134-142.
[16] 刘淑华, 张宗和. 储层特征曲线重构反演技术——以冀东油田南堡凹陷为例[J]. 勘探地球物理进展, 2008,3(1):53-58.
[16] Liu S H, Zhang Z H. Construction of characteristic curve and inversion of reservoir property:A Case study in Nanpu depression of Jidong oilfield[J]. Progress in Exploration Geophysics, 2008,3(1):53-58.
[17] 范代读, 邱桂强, 李从先, 等. 东营三角洲的古流向研究[J]. 石油学报, 2000,21(1):29-33.
[17] Fan D D, Qiu G Q, Li C X, et al. Paleocurrent propertiles of Dongying delta in Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2000,21(1):29-33.
[18] 侯明才, 田景春, 陈洪德, 等. 东营凹陷牛庄洼陷沙三中段浊积扇特征研究[J]. 成都理工学院学报, 2002,29(5):506-510.
[18] Hou M C, Tian J C, Chen H D, et al. Turbidite fan characters of the intermediate section of member 3 of shahejie formation in niuzhuang depression of dongying area[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology, 2002,29(5):506-510.
[19] 严进荣, 陈东, 郭勤涛, 等. 洼陷中浊积岩沉积特征及油气富集规律研究[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2002,22(3):19-24.
[19] Yan J R, Chen D, Guo Q T, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of the turbidites and oil and gas accumulation in the secondary depressions in eastern China[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan, 2002,22(3):19-24.
[20] 赵澄林, 张善文, 袁静, 等. 胜利油区沉积储层与油气[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1999: 89-96.
[20] Zhao C L, Zhang S W, Yuan J, et al. Sedimentary reservoir and oil gas in Shengli oil area[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1999: 89-96.
[21] 饶孟余, 张遂安, 李秀生. 牛庄洼陷沙三中亚段浊积岩储层成岩作用及主控因素分析[J]. 地质找矿论丛, 2007,22(1):66-70.
[21] Rao M Y, Zhang S A, Li X S. Diagenesis and controlling factors of the tuebidite reservoir of sub-middle of the third member of shahejie formation in niuzhuang sag[J]. Contributions to Geology and Mineral Resources Research, 2007,22(1):66-70.
[22] 邱桂强, 王居峰, 李从先. 东营凹陷沙三中东营三角洲地层格架与油气勘探[J]. 同济大学学报:自然科学版, 2001(10):1195-1199.
[22] Qiu G Q, Wang J F, Li C X. Preliminary study on stratigraphy architecture of middle-shasan Dongying delta and its significance to hydrocarbon exploration[J]. Journal of Tongji University, 2001(10):1195-1199.
[23] 操应长, 姜在兴, 夏斌, 等. 陆相断陷湖盆T-R层序的特点及其控制因素:以东营凹陷古近系沙河街组三段层序地层为例[J]. 地质科学, 2004,39(1):111-122.
[23] Cao Y C, Jiang Z X, Xia B, et al. Characters and controlling factors of T-R sequence in lacustrine deposits of rift basin:An example from the Dongying depression,eastern China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2004,39(1):111-122.
[24] 周学文, 姜在兴, 汤望新, 等. 牛庄洼陷沙三中亚段三角洲—重力流体系沉积特征与模式[J]. 沉积学报, 2018,36(2):376-389.
[24] Zhou X W, Jiang Z X, Tang W X, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and depositional model of delta and gravity flow system of the middle member 3 of Shahejie formation in Niuzhuang Sag[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2018,36(2):376-389.
[1] 王成泉, 王孟华, 周佳宜, 王盛亮, 杨洲鹏, 刘慧, 张红文. 多属性融合定量储层预测方法研究与应用——以廊固凹陷杨税务潜山为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 87-95.
[2] 刘鸿洲, 王孟华, 张浩, 彭玲丽, 李雯, 张杰, 赵智鹏, 伍泽荆. 基于分频构形反演方法的河道砂精准预测——以华北冀中探区赵皇庄地区为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1311-1319.
[3] 刘家材, 张冲, 韩绪军. 哈萨克斯坦B油田M02段综合地震储层预测[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(2): 379-386.
[4] 刘浩杰, 陈雨茂, 王延光, 宗兆云, 吴国忱, 侯庆杰. 粘弹介质叠前四参数同步反演及应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(1): 140-148.
[5] 杨雪, 裴家学, 何绍勇, 蒋学峰, 谢天寿, 高建军. 煤层发育条件下薄储层预测方法研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(2): 406-411.
[6] 晋达, 杜浩坤, 孟凡冰, 秦广胜, 苏云, 李娜. 普光地区长兴组生物礁储层分布预测[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(1): 50-58.
[7] 陈彦虎, 陈佳. 波形指示反演在煤层屏蔽薄砂岩分布预测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2019, 43(6): 1254-1261.
[8] 沙志彬, 万晓明, 赵忠泉, 梁金强, 杨瑞召, 白钰, 柴祎. 叠前同时反演技术在珠江口盆地西部海域天然气水合物储层预测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2019, 43(3): 476-485.
[9] 国春香, 郭淑文, 朱伟峰, 袁雪花, 彭雪梅, 邢兴, 陈明旭. 河流相砂泥岩薄互层预测方法研究与应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2018, 42(3): 594-599.
[10] 吕振宇, 边立恩, 于娅, 王军. 地震正演技术在主控物源研究中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2018, 42(2): 276-284.
[11] 凌云, 杜向东, 曹思远. FAVO反演技术及其在深水砂岩储层中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2018, 42(1): 161-165.
[12] 石亚兰, 贾曙光, 郑求根, 李俊威, 薛明喜. 叠前同时反演在浅层疏松砂岩储层预测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2017, 41(1): 9-15.
[13] 何丽娟, 王振峰, 邓勇, 张毅, 钟泽红, 张志让, 王利杰. 虚拟井技术在琼东南深水区储层预测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2016, 40(2): 390-397.
[14] 李尧. 基线差密度校正法的应用——以蓬莱9-1油田叠前反演处理为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2015, 39(5): 1020-1026.
[15] 于景强, 曲志鹏, 吴明荣, 罗平平. 东营凹陷始新世滩坝砂岩有效储层地震预测[J]. 物探与化探, 2014, 38(4): 860-864.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-3
版权所有 © 2021《物探与化探》编辑部
通讯地址:北京市学院路29号航遥中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060192;62060193 E-mail:whtbjb@sina.com