Please wait a minute...
E-mail Alert Rss
 
物探与化探  2014, Vol. Issue (3): 601-606    DOI: 10.11720/wtyht.2014.3.33
  计算技术与信息处理 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
顾观文, 吴文鹂, 梁萌
中国地质科学院 地球物理地球化学勘查研究所, 河北 廊坊 065000
The multi-core paralleled strategies and efficiency analysis of 3D magnetotelluric forward modeling and inversion
Gu Guanwen, Wu Wenli, Liang Meng
Institute of Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, Langfang 065000, China
全文: PDF(1209 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

首先以频点为并行粒度,完成了MT三维正演并行计算,然后将该算法引入共轭梯度法MT三维反演过程中的正演求数据的残差、反演方程右端项的求取、共轭梯度求解模型增量这三个计算环节中,使得MT三维反演中的主要计算量实现并行化。对编制的MT三维正、反演并行计算程序,在多核工作站上通过理论地电模型进行了正演试算和反演验证,并在串行和并行两种计算方式下进行了计算效率对比。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
Abstract

A parallel magnetotelluric (MT) 3D forward modeling algorithm was implemented on multi-core CPU, and was introduced into the 3D conjugate gradient (CG) inversion algorithm with MT data for parallel computation. The authors tested the parallel MT 3D forward modeling code with a theoretical model and the parallel 3D inversion code with one synthetic data. A comparison of the execution efficiency was made between serial computation and parallel computation. The results indicate that the parallel 3D forward modeling and inversion computation are correct, and the efficiency of computation is greatly improved.

收稿日期: 2013-11-30      出版日期: 2014-06-10
:  P631  
基金资助:

国家重大科学仪器设备开发专项项目(2011YQ05006006);国土资源部“十五”重点科技项目(20010211)

作者简介: 顾观文(1975-),男,高级工程师,从事电磁法正、反演研究及其软件研制工作。Email:guguanwen@igge.cn。
引用本文:   
顾观文, 吴文鹂, 梁萌. null[J]. 物探与化探, 2014, (3): 601-606.
Gu Guanwen, Wu Wenli, Liang Meng. The multi-core paralleled strategies and efficiency analysis of 3D magnetotelluric forward modeling and inversion. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2014, (3): 601-606.
链接本文:  
https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/10.11720/wtyht.2014.3.33      或      https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2014/V/I3/601

[1] Newman G A,Alumbaugh D L.Three-Dimension Electromagnetic modeling and inversion on massive parallel computer[R].Sandia Report,1996:SAND96-0582,UC-400,403,405.

[2] Newman G A,Alumbaugh D L.Three-Dimension massive parallel Electro- magnetic Inversion-I.Theory[J].Geophys.J.Int,1997:345-354.

[3] Michael Commer,Newman G A.Large scale 3D EM inversion using optimized simulation grids nonconformal to the model space[R].SEG 2006,PAPR247.

[4] Michael Commer,Newman G A.3D CSEM modeling and inversion for hydrocarbon reservoir mapping The bathymetry problem[R].SEG 2006:247.

[5] Carazzone J J, Dickens T A, Green K E,et al. Inversion Study of a Large Marine CSEM Survey[R].SEG Las Vegas 2008 Annual Meeting,2008:644-647.

[6] Yoshioka K, Zhdanov M S. Electromagnetic forward modeling based on the integral equation method using parallel computers[C]//75th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2005:550-553.

[7] Ken Yoshioka, Zhdanov M S.Modeling large-scale geoelectrical structures with inhomogeneous backgrounds using the integral equation method: applications to the bathymetry e.ect study in marine CSEM data[R].SEG 2006,PAPR211.

[8] Endo M, Cuma M, Zhdanov M S.Multi-grid IE method for large-scale models with inhomogeneous background[R].SEG 2007, seg-annual,2007.

[9] Zhdanov M S, Cuma M.Three-dimensional electromagnetic holographic imaging in offshore petroleum exploration[C]//SEG Las Vegas 2008 Annual Meeting,2008:629-633.

[10] Tan H D,Tong T,Lin C H.The parallel 3D magnetotelluric forward modeling algorithm[J].Applied Geophysics,2006,3(4).

[11] Lin C H,Tan H D,Tong T.Parallel rapid relaxation inversion of 3D magnetotelluric data[J].Applied Geophysics,2009,6(1).

[12] Mitsuhata Yuji, Uchida Toshihiro.3D magnetotelluric modeling using the T-Ω finite-element method[J].Geophysics, 2004,69(1) :108-119.

[13] Sadd Y. Iterative methods for sparse linear systems[R].Society of Inustrial and Applied Mathematics,1996.

[14] Newman G A,Alumbaugh D L.Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using non-linear conjugate gradients[J].Geophys J Int, 2000:140, 410-424.

[15] Mackie R L, Madden T R.Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using conjugate gradients[J].Geophysical J Int, 1993b:115, 215-229.

[16] Zhdanov M S,Varentov I M,Weaver J T,et al.Methods for modeling electromagnetic fields: Results from COMMEMI-The international project on the comparison of modeling methods for electromagnetic induction[J].Journal of Applied Geophysics, 1997,37:133-271.

[1] 陈秀娟, 刘之的, 刘宇羲, 柴慧强, 王勇. 致密储层孔隙结构研究综述[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 22-31.
[2] 肖关华, 张伟, 陈恒春, 卓武, 王艳君, 任丽莹. 浅层地震技术在济南地下空间探测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 96-103.
[3] 石磊, 管耀, 冯进, 高慧, 邱欣卫, 阙晓铭. 基于多级次流动单元的砂砾岩储层分类渗透率评价方法——以陆丰油田古近系文昌组W53油藏为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 78-86.
[4] 陈大磊, 王润生, 贺春艳, 王珣, 尹召凯, 于嘉宾. 综合地球物理探测在深部空间结构中的应用——以胶东金矿集区为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 70-77.
[5] 周能, 邓可晴, 庄文英. 基于线性放电法的多道脉冲幅度分析器设计[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 221-228.
[6] 吴燕民, 彭正辉, 元勇虎, 朱今祥, 刘闯, 葛薇, 凌国平. 一种基于差分接收的电磁感应阵列探头的设计与实现[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 214-220.
[7] 王猛, 刘媛媛, 王大勇, 董根旺, 田亮, 黄金辉, 林曼曼. 无人机航磁测量在荒漠戈壁地区的应用效果分析[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 206-213.
[8] 张化鹏, 钱卫, 刘瑾, 武立林, 宋泽卓. 基于伪随机信号的磁电法渗漏模型试验[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 198-205.
[9] 张建智, 胡富杭, 刘海啸, 邢国章. 煤矿老窑采空区地—井TEM响应特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 191-197.
[10] 张宇哲, 孟麟, 王智. 基于Gmsh的起伏地形下井—地直流电法正演模拟[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 182-190.
[11] 马德志, 王炜, 金明霞, 王海昆, 张明强. 海上地震勘探斜缆采集中鬼波产生机理及压制效果分析[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 175-181.
[12] 张洁. 基于拉伸率的3DVSP道集切除技术及应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 169-174.
[13] 丁骁, 莫思特, 李碧雄, 黄华. 混凝土内部裂缝对电磁波传输特性参数的影响[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 160-168.
[14] 崔瑞康, 孙建孟, 刘行军, 文晓峰. 低阻页岩电阻率主控因素研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 150-159.
[15] 陈亮, 付立恒, 蔡冻, 李凡, 李振宇, 鲁恺. 基于模拟退火法的磁共振测深多源谐波噪声压制方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 141-149.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-3
版权所有 © 2021《物探与化探》编辑部
通讯地址:北京市学院路29号航遥中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060192;62060193 E-mail:whtbjb@sina.com