Please wait a minute...
E-mail Alert Rss
 
物探与化探  2014, Vol. Issue (3): 527-533    DOI: 10.11720/wtyht.2014.3.20
  方法技术研究 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
连续小波变换识别位场场源法的噪声影响分析与尺度因子的选择
刘彩云1,2, 姚长利1
1. 中国地质大学 地球物理与信息技术学院, 北京 100083;
2. 长江大学 一年级工作部, 湖北 荆州 434023
An analysis of noise effect on the identification of sources of potential fields with the continuous wavelet transform method and the choice of the scaling factor
Liu Caiyun1,2, Yao Changli1
1. School of Geophysics and Information Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
2. School of Mathematics and Information, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434023, China
全文: PDF(1091 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

为提高连续小波变换识别位场场源准确度,研究噪声对场源识别结果的影响和尺度因子优选方法问题。根据连续小波变换识别位场场源的基本原理,用该方法对不同噪声水平的合成数据进行场源识别,分析噪声对于场源识别结果的影响,研究小波变换的尺度因子对噪声压制的效果,讨论连续小波变换进行场源识别时尺度因子的选取方法。理论模型和实测资料场源识别结果表明,噪声会降低连续小波变换场源识别结果的准确度,笔者提出的尺度因子优选方法能有效压制噪声干扰,提高场源识别结果的准确度。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
Abstract

In order to improve the accuracy of the identification of sources of potential fields with the continuous wavelet transform method (CWT), this paper deals with the effect of noise and the choice of scaling factor. Firstly, the principle of the identification of sources of potential fields with the CWT method is presented. Secondly, the method is used to identify the sources from potential field data with noise of various levels, and the effect of noise is analyzed. Lastly, the effect of suppressing noise by CWT is analyzed, and the choice of scaling factor is studied. The results of identification of the sources of synthetic data and field data indicate that the noise can decrease the accuracy of identification result. but the choice of the scaling factor can suppress the noise and improve the accuracy of the identification result.

收稿日期: 2013-07-01      出版日期: 2014-06-10
:  P631  
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金项目(61273179);湖北省教育厅科技项目(D20131206)

通讯作者: 姚长利(1965-),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事重磁勘探方法技术研究。E-mail: clyao@cugb.edu.cn。
作者简介: 刘彩云(1975-),女,博士研究生,副教授,从事重磁勘探、小波分析和应用数学等方面的教学和科研工作。
引用本文:   
刘彩云, 姚长利. 连续小波变换识别位场场源法的噪声影响分析与尺度因子的选择[J]. 物探与化探, 2014, (3): 527-533.
Liu Caiyun, Yao Changli. An analysis of noise effect on the identification of sources of potential fields with the continuous wavelet transform method and the choice of the scaling factor. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2014, (3): 527-533.
链接本文:  
https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/10.11720/wtyht.2014.3.20      或      https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2014/V/I3/527

[1] Nabighian M N,Ander M E,Grauch V J S, et al.Historical development of the gravity method in exploration[G]//Society of Exploration Geophysicists,2005:63-89.

[2] Nabighian M N, Grauch V J S, Hansen R O,et al. The historical development of the magnetic method in exploration[G]//Society of Exploration Geophysicists,2005:33-61.

[3] Nabighian M N. The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation[J].Geophysics, 1972,37:507~517.

[4] 王明,骆遥,罗锋,等.欧拉反褶积在重磁位场中应用与发展[J].物探与化探,2012,36(5).

[5] Thurston J B, Smith R S. Automatic conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, and susceptibility contrast using the SPI (TM) method[J].Geophysics, 1997, 62:807-813.

[6] Li X. Understanding 3D analytic signal amplitude[G]//Society of Exploration Geophysicists,2006:13-16.

[7] 马国庆.位场(重磁)及其梯度异常自动解释方法研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2013.

[8] Bastani M,Pedersen L B. Automatic interpretation of magnetic dike parameters using the analytic signal technique[J].Geophysics, 2001, 66: 551-561.

[9] Salem A, Ravat D, Mushayandebvu M F, et al. Linearized least-squares method for interpretation of potential-field data from sources of simple geometry[J].Geophysics, 2004, 69:783~788.

[10] 范美宁.欧拉反褶积方法的研究与应用[D].长春:吉林大学,2006.

[11] Smith R S, Thurston J B, Dai T,et al. iSPI-The improved source parameter imaging method[J].Geophysical Prospecting, 1998, 46: 141-151.

[12] Salem A,Smith R S. Depth and structural index from the normalized local wavenumber of 2D magnetic anomalies[J].Geophysical Prospecting, 2005, 51: 83-89.

[13] Labat D.Recent advances in wavelet analyses:A review of concepts[J].Journal of Hydrology,2005,314:275-288.

[14] Moreau F, Gibert D, Holschneider M. Wavelet analysis of potential fields[J].Inverse problem,1997,13:165-178.

[15] Moreau F, Gibert D, Holschneider M,et al. Identification of sources of potential fields with the continuous wavelet transform:Basic theory[J].Journal of geophysical research,1999,104(B3):5003-5013.

[16] Sailhac P, Galdeano A, Gibert D,et al. Identification of sources of potential fields with the continuous wavelet transform: Complex wavelets and application to aeromagnetic profiles in French Guiana[J].Journal of Geophysical Research, 2000, 105, 19455-19475.

[17] 陈玉东.复小波变换反演重力异常[J].物探与化探, 2003,27(5):354-361.

[18] Sailhac P, Gibert D. Identification of sources of potential fields with the continuous wavelet transform: Two-dimensional wavelets and multipolar approximations[J].Journal of Geophysical Research, 2003, 108, 2296-2306.

[19] Boukerbout H, Gibert D, Sailhac P. Identification of sources of potential fields with the continuous wavelet transform: Application to VLF data[R].Geophysical Research Letters, 2006,30,1427.

[20] Boukerbout H, Gibert D. Identification of sources of potential fields with the continuous wavelete transform: Two-dimensional ridgelet analysis[J].Journal of geophysical research, 2006, 111:B07104.

[21] Sailhac P, Gibert D, Boukerbout H. The theory of the continuous wavelet transform in the interpretation of potential fields: a review[J].Geophysical prospecting, 2009,57: 517-525.

[22] Abdelrahman E M, Bayoumi A I, Abdelhady Y E, et al. Gravity interpretation using correlation factors between successive least-squares residual anomalies[J].Geophysics, 1989, 54:1614-1621.

[23] Zeng H,Xu D,Tan H. A model study for estimating optimum upwardcontinuation height for gravity separation with application to a Bouguer gravity anomaly over a mineral deposit, Jilin province, northeast China[J].Geophysics, 2007, 72, 145-150.

[24] Srivastava S,Agarwal B N P. Inversion of the amplitude of the two-dimensional analytic signal of the magnetic anomaly by the particle swarm optimization technique[J].Geophysical Journal International, 2010, 182:652-662.

[1] 陈秀娟, 刘之的, 刘宇羲, 柴慧强, 王勇. 致密储层孔隙结构研究综述[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 22-31.
[2] 肖关华, 张伟, 陈恒春, 卓武, 王艳君, 任丽莹. 浅层地震技术在济南地下空间探测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 96-103.
[3] 石磊, 管耀, 冯进, 高慧, 邱欣卫, 阙晓铭. 基于多级次流动单元的砂砾岩储层分类渗透率评价方法——以陆丰油田古近系文昌组W53油藏为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 78-86.
[4] 陈大磊, 王润生, 贺春艳, 王珣, 尹召凯, 于嘉宾. 综合地球物理探测在深部空间结构中的应用——以胶东金矿集区为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 70-77.
[5] 周能, 邓可晴, 庄文英. 基于线性放电法的多道脉冲幅度分析器设计[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 221-228.
[6] 吴燕民, 彭正辉, 元勇虎, 朱今祥, 刘闯, 葛薇, 凌国平. 一种基于差分接收的电磁感应阵列探头的设计与实现[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 214-220.
[7] 王猛, 刘媛媛, 王大勇, 董根旺, 田亮, 黄金辉, 林曼曼. 无人机航磁测量在荒漠戈壁地区的应用效果分析[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 206-213.
[8] 张化鹏, 钱卫, 刘瑾, 武立林, 宋泽卓. 基于伪随机信号的磁电法渗漏模型试验[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 198-205.
[9] 张建智, 胡富杭, 刘海啸, 邢国章. 煤矿老窑采空区地—井TEM响应特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 191-197.
[10] 张宇哲, 孟麟, 王智. 基于Gmsh的起伏地形下井—地直流电法正演模拟[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 182-190.
[11] 马德志, 王炜, 金明霞, 王海昆, 张明强. 海上地震勘探斜缆采集中鬼波产生机理及压制效果分析[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 175-181.
[12] 张洁. 基于拉伸率的3DVSP道集切除技术及应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 169-174.
[13] 丁骁, 莫思特, 李碧雄, 黄华. 混凝土内部裂缝对电磁波传输特性参数的影响[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 160-168.
[14] 崔瑞康, 孙建孟, 刘行军, 文晓峰. 低阻页岩电阻率主控因素研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 150-159.
[15] 陈亮, 付立恒, 蔡冻, 李凡, 李振宇, 鲁恺. 基于模拟退火法的磁共振测深多源谐波噪声压制方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 141-149.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-3
版权所有 © 2021《物探与化探》编辑部
通讯地址:北京市学院路29号航遥中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060192;62060193 E-mail:whtbjb@sina.com