A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE DATA INTEGRATION METHODS FOR GEOCHEMICAL AND CULTIVATED LAND QUALITY INVESTIGATION
SANG Ling-ling1,2, GAO Ge3, YUN Wen-ju2,4,5, ZHU De-hai4,5
1. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; 2. Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Land and Resources, Beijing 100035, China; 3. Shaanxi Institute of Surveying and Mapping of Land, Xi'an 710054, China; 4. College of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China; 5. Key Laboratory of Land Quality, Ministry of Land and Resources, Beijing 100035, China
Abstract：Land quality geochemical assessment and cultivated land quality evaluation constitute the basic work of the land resources quality investigation and evaluation. Integration research on the two results is an inevitable trend between the current data sharing and cross-disciplinary data integration. In this paper, from data independence, results practicability and scientificity, the two results were combined by simple superposition method, comprehensive method or factor method. With Qianguo County in Jinlin Province as a case study area, the authors investigated the advantages and disadvantage of the integration results. The results show that different integration methods had different advantages and disadvantages: the simple superposition method based on data of two results could maintain their respective independence; the comprehensive method based on the results is easy to express, but with too much emphasis placed on experience; the factor method based on two survey data can clearly express the physical meaning, but with insufficient theoretical support.
桑玲玲, 高歌, 郧文聚, 朱德海. 地球化学与耕地质量调查数据整合方法对比[J]. 物探与化探, 2014, 38(2): 359-362，376.
SANG Ling-ling, GAO Ge, YUN Wen-ju, ZHU De-hai. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE DATA INTEGRATION METHODS FOR GEOCHEMICAL AND CULTIVATED LAND QUALITY INVESTIGATION. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2014, 38(2): 359-362，376.
[1] 高向军,马仁会.中国农用土地等级评价研究进展[J].农业工程学报,2002,18(1):165-168.[2] 李强,苏强,赵烨,等.基于土地产能的城郊农用地健康评价体系与方法探讨[J].地理与地理信息科学,2008,24(1):70-74.[3] 奚小环.生态地球化学:从调查实践到应用理论的系统工程[J].地学前缘,2008,15(5):1-8.[4] Mandal D K,Mandal C,Velayutham M, et al.Development of A Land Quality Index for Sorghum in Indian Semiarid Tropics (SAT)[J].Agricultural Systems,2001,70:335-350.[5] 中华人民共和国国土资源部.GB/T28407-2012 农用地质量分等规程[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2012.[6] 中国地质调查局. DD2008-06 土地质量地球化学评估技术要求(试行) [S].北京:2008.[7] 桑玲玲,张晓沛,杨建宇,等.农用地绿色产能评价体系构建及实证分析[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(7):235-239.[8] 路婕,李玲,吴克宁,等.基于农用地分等和土壤环境质量评价的耕地综合质量评价[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(2):323-329.[9] 张晓沛,张超,朱德海,等.用搜索法集成耕地分等与环境评估成果的研究[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(3):325-330.[10] 王立胜,汪缓缓,余涛,等.土地质量地球化学评估与绿色产能评价研究:以吉林大安市为例[J].现代地质,2012,26(5):879-885.[11] Hakanson L.An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control: a sedimentological approach[J].Water Research,1980, 14 (8):975-1001.
