DATA PREPROCESSING AND WEAK SIGNAL DETECTION IN BOREHOLE MAGNETIC SURVEY
WANG Sai-xin1, LIU Tian-you1, OU Yang1, GAO Wen-li2, QIU Li-quan2, FENG Jie2
1. Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China; 2. Institute of Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, CAGS, Langfang 065000, China
Abstract：As the logging instrument is placed near the field source, the borehole magnetic data are likely to be affected by the internal magnetic field when the drill hole penetrates the magnetic body. As a result, the useful signal is often suppressed by strong jamming and not easy to identify. Therefore, it is important to find a method which can identify the weak signal through data preprocessing. In this paper, the methods for ground survey, called total horizontal derivate of tilt-angle and analytical Signal Amplitude, were used in borehole magnetic survey. The authors proposed vertical derivative of tilt-angle through coordinate transformation and a new method called Equalized Analytical Signal Amplitude. Through data processing of the model, the authors point out that the two kinds of methods can both identify the magnetic body and give the boundary information. The authors also give a standard to choose a suitable window to calculate the Equalized Analytical Signal Amplitude. The two kinds of methods were applied to Jiangsu ZK002 borehole magnetic data preprocessing. The vertical derivative of tilt-angle enlarged the interference of data, wheres the Equalized Analytical Signal Amplitude uses normalized method to identify the weak signal and suppress the interference. The Equalized Analytical Signal Amplitude is also well consistent with the results of magnetic susceptibility logging and the borehole data in ZK002.
王赛昕, 刘天佑, 欧洋, 高文利, 邱礼泉, 冯杰. 井中磁测资料预处理与弱信号识别[J]. 物探与化探, 2014, 38(1): 90-95.
WANG Sai-xin, LIU Tian-you, OU Yang, GAO Wen-li, QIU Li-quan, FENG Jie. DATA PREPROCESSING AND WEAK SIGNAL DETECTION IN BOREHOLE MAGNETIC SURVEY. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2014, 38(1): 90-95.
[1] 蔡柏林,王作勤,杨坤彪,等. 井中磁测物理-地质模型及其应用[M].北京:地质出版社,1989. [2] 潘和平. 地球物理测井与井中物探[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2009. [3] 王庆乙,李学圣,徐立忠. 高精度井中三分量磁测是矿山深部找矿的有效手段[J]. 物探与化探,2009,33(3):235-239. [4] 高宝龙,陶德益,詹应林,等. 大冶铁矿接替资源勘查项目中"空、地、井"磁法测量的应用[J]. 地质与勘探,2010,46(3):483-490. [5] 习宇飞,刘天佑,杨坤彪,等. 欧拉反褶积法用于井中磁测数据反演与解释[J]. 工程地球物理学报,2008,5(2). [6] Miller H G, Singh V. Potential field tilt-a new concept for location of potential field sources[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics,1994,32:213-217. [7] Miller H G, Singh V. Semiquantitative techniques for the removal of directional trends from potential field data[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 1994, 32:199-211. [8] Verduzco B, Fairhead J D, Green C D, et al. New insights into magnetic derivatives for structural mapping[J]. The Leading Edge, 2004,23:116-119. [9] Nabighian M N. The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal crosssection:its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation[J]. Geophysics, 1972, 37(3):507-517. [10] Nabighian M N. Toward a three-dimensional automatic interpretation of potential field data via generalized Hilbert transforms:Fundamental relations[J]. Geophysics.1984,49(6):780-786. [11] 王赛昕,刘林静. 均值归一总水平导数边界识别方法[J]. 工程地球物理学报,2011,8(6):699-704.
