1. Beijing Research Institude of Geology, CNNC Key Laboratory of Uranium Resource Exploration and Evaluation Technology, Beijing 100029, China; 2. No. 261 Geological Party, Nuclear Industry Geological Bureau of Jiangxi Province, Yingtan 335000, China
Abstract:Through a comparison of AMT measurement between EH-4 and V8, the authors analyzed original data and inversion results of these two sets of devices in the same area, and made a comparative study of the performance parameters and work efficiencies of these two sets of devices. The results show that both V8 and EH-4 can collect real reliable data, V8 can collect lower frequency signal than EH-4,whereas EH-4 can collect higher high-quality frequency signal than V8. In addition, the continuity of data collected by V8 is better than that of data collected by EH-4, the efficiency of V8 is higher than that of EH-4, but EH-4 has the advantage of lower cost.